Newsroom
Print

Print

DODD, BERMAN STATEMENT ON IRAN SANCTIONS CONFERENCE REPORT AGREEMENT

June 21, 2010

WASHINGTON -- Today Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) and House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman (D-CA), Conference Co-chairs for the bill to strengthen Iran sanctions, announced they had reached an agreement on a draft joint text. The text will now be submitted to other Conferees for review.
 
The bill will equip President Obama with a full range of tools to deal with the threats posed by Iran.  It will impose new sanctions on businesses involved in supplying Iran with refined petroleum or helping them produce it. It will also impose sanctions on financial institutions doing business with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) or with certain Iranian banks blacklisted by the Department of the Treasury.
 
“A month ago, we announced our intention to develop a powerful package of new sanctions against Iran that would substantially augment ongoing multilateral efforts by the U.N. Security Council and the European Union.  Our agreement does just that.” 
“If applied forcefully by the President, this act will bring strong new pressure to bear on Tehran in order to combat its proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, support for international terrorism, and gross human rights abuses.”
 
“First and foremost, we must stop Iran from continuing its illicit nuclear program.  No one has done more diplomatically than President Obama and his national security team to advance this cause.  Our legislation will provide the administration with powerful new tools to press Iran to change course, including a full range of tough new energy and financial sanctions.”
Attached and below are a one page summary and the text of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010, H.R. 2194.
 
 

Brief Summary of Conference text, H.R. 2194, the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions,
Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010
 
H.R. 2194, the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010, would strengthen the underlying Iran Sanctions Act (ISA) by imposing an array of tough new economic penalties aimed at persuading Iran to change its conduct.  Targets of the Act range from business entities involved in refined petroleum sales to Iran or support for Iran’s domestic refining efforts to international banking institutions involved with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Iran’s illicit nuclear program or its support for terrorism. The Conference text would augment the sanctions regime envisioned in the earlier versions of the Act passed by the House and the Senate by supplementing the energy sanctions in those versions with an additional, powerful set of banking prohibitions. 
 
The Act would impose severe restrictions on foreign financial institutions doing business with key Iranian banks or the IRGC.  In effect, the Act would present foreign banks doing business with blacklisted Iranian entities a stark choice— cease your activities or be denied critical access to America’s financial system.  The Act also would hold U.S. banks accountable for actions by their foreign subsidiaries (U.S. companies have long been banned from all the activities for which foreign entities will be sanctionable under this Act). The Act reinforces and goes far beyond recently-enacted UN Sanctions.  Major highlights of the Act include provisions to:
  • Expand the scope of sanctions authorized under ISA by imposing sanctions on foreign companies  -- including insurance, financing and shipping companies -- that sell Iran goods, services, or know-how that assist it in developing its energy sector.
  • Ban U.S. banks from engaging in financial transactions with foreign banks doing business with the IRGC or facilitating Iran’s illicit nuclear program or its support for terrorism.
  • Impose significant financial penalties and travel restrictions on Iran’s human rights abusers. 
  • Establish three new sanctions, in addition to the menu of six sanctions that already exists under ISA, including: (1) a prohibition on access to foreign exchange in the U.S.; (2) a prohibition on access to the U.S. banking system; and (3) a prohibition on property transactions in the U.S. The Act would require the President to impose at least three of the possible now-nine sanctions on an entity in violation of ISA. 
  • Ban U.S. government procurement contracts for any foreign company that exports to Iran technology used to restrict the free flow of information or to disrupt, monitor, or otherwise restrict freedom of speech.
  • Require a certification from a company bidding on  a U.S. government procurement contract that it  is not engaged in sanctionable conduct.
  • Provide a legal framework by which U.S. states, local governments, and certain other investors can divest their portfolios   of foreign companies involved in Iran’s energy sector.  Strengthen efforts to stop black-market diversion of sensitive technologies to Iran. 
  • Strengthen the U.S. trade embargo against Iran by codifying longstanding executive orders and limiting the goods exempted from the embargo.
  • Increase substantially the criminal penalties for sanctions violations by U.S. entities.
 
Sanctions under H.R. 2194 would terminate once the President certifies to Congress that Iran no longer satisfies the requirements for designation as a state-sponsor of terrorism under U.S. law, and has ceased its efforts to develop or acquire nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons and ballistic missiles and ballistic-missile launch technology.
 
Click here to view a summary of the Iran Sanctions Conference Report Agreement
 
Click here to view the text of the Iran Sanctions Conference Report Agreement

###