Prepared Testimony of Subcommittee Chairman Robert F. Bennett (R-UT)
Hearing on Identity Theft.

April 1, 1998

Good morning and welcome to the second in a series of hearings the Subcommittee has held on fraudulent financial instruments and identity theft. If you are an honest person, as most people in this country are, you probably have a hard time understanding how someone with criminal intent could actually assume another person's identity. It is difficult enough for most of us to produce the proper identification to prove who we are for purposes of cashing a check or traveling overseas. Attempting to impersonate someone else seems not only difficult but rife with the risk of being apprehended.

In fact, identity theft is neither difficult nor risky. There are books, videotapes, and websites detailing, step by step, the process of assuming another person's identity. I have a few of those publications with me today. Furthermore, identity theft and its companion crimes often go uninvestigated and unprosecuted, and the criminals know it. In many cases, there is no appropriate law enforcement authority to investigate these crimes because they generally occur in multiple jurisdictions. Others are not pursued because the financial losses do not meet the established thresholds for prosecution. For the victims, however, identity theft can result not only in financial losses, but in the loss of reputation and security which are difficult to recover.

It is important for us to realize that the witnesses who appear before the Subcommittee today have all been through an experience many of us cannot fathom.

Having your identity stolen is like having your house robbed (except that no law enforcement seems to have jurisdiction over the crime). It's often not the material loss that hurts the most, it's the sense of violation that the victim feels at having his home invaded. When a criminal assumes your identity, that sense of violation is even more acute and enduring. The criminal has the ability to repeatedly violate the same individual's identity. We have testimony which will be submitted for the record by one of our witnesses who could not appear in person today who found that it was not only his credit history which had been violated by someone who assumed his identity, but that this individual had actually committed criminal acts and been sentenced to prison under the victim's identity. The insidious nature of these acts must be countered so that these victims will have somewhere to turn to seek assistance.

Since our first hearing on this subject last fall, the Subcommittee has continued its investigation and it has received numerous additional reports of identity theft. Ironically, one of my Subcommittee investigators had his credit card stolen and had over $3,000 charged to his account. This caused him to exceed his credit limit on that card and he was therefore without a credit card during a part of the Christmas holidays. I have discovered that a significant number of individuals on my own staff have had similar experiences.

Today we will hear from some victims of identity theft who have come to Washington at their own expense to tell their stories. We also will hear from the Secret Service on how difficult it is to investigate these crimes, obtain prosecution, and imprison the guilty. It is my hope that by bringing these disturbing stories out in an open forum, we will make individuals more aware of the problem so they can take appropriate precautions.

I will also be looking for guidance and help from the Secret Service in drafting a piece of legislation which should: 1) clearly identify a single federal agency with jurisdiction to investigate and help prosecute the criminals involved in these crimes, 2) lower the threshold amounts required before an investigation can begin to a reasonable level, and 3) provide sufficient funds to accomplish these missions.

With that, I will introduce our four witnesses. On the first panel, Darylle Goodfield, Wayne Matus, and Sue Carter will share with us their experiences regarding identity theft. Mr. Matus, Chairman D'Amato had hoped to be here to introduce you himself, but he was called away and asked me to give you a warm welcome and thank you for your efforts. On the second panel, we will hear from James Bauer of the Secret Service, who will describe the relative ease with which these crimes are committed and the challenges faced by the Secret Service in trying to investigate them. Joining him to give us a demonstration of the how identity theft is accomplished will be Mary Riley also of the Secret Service.


Home | Menu | Links | Info | Chairman's Page